Monday, December 05, 2016

Maybe This is Why Hillary Lost the Election!

*******

Hillary Clinton Crimes In This Video Will Shock You !!
Published on Nov 30, 2016
*******
Hillary Clinton's MOST Idiotic Moments 
Published on Nov 30, 2016
*******

Hillary Clinton Body Count Documentary - Serial Killer for President!
Published on Sep 10, 2016
This is the definitive documentary on the Hillary and Bill Clinton killing spree that has been ongoing since they burst onto the scene in Arkansas. A trail of dead and mysterious deaths surround the Clinton's and I document 114 and more deaths in this film that they are directly connected to. Hill and Bill are Illuminati puppets, that are killing off anyone who might expose the 4th branches operations. Bill and Hillary are some of the most proficient serial killers of all time and need to be put into prison immediately. 
*******

Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters
Mars Daniels
Published on Nov 6, 2013
*******
There's a simple reason for Clinton's shocking loss to Trump
Daniel Alpert, Westwood Capital
Nov. 14, 2016
In the aftermath of Donald Trump's shocking electoral victory over Hillary Clinton, it is time for very deep soul searching among Democratic Party leaders as well as the party's rank and file.
There are many things to blame for Clinton's loss, some obviously true (she is an awkward campaigner), some convenient but less true (Americans not being ready for a female president, which is nonsense, or an aversion to political dynasties, which have happened before).
But the very inconvenient truth that must be absorbed, by the technocratic Democrats of the Obama years and by the apparent plurality of voters who supported Secretary Clinton, is that the Obama administration did not deliver on its promises of hope and change, and broke the trust of many of those (enough, at least, to elect Donald Trump) who were counting on a sharp departure from business as usual following the Great Recession.
It is tempting to chalk up the Trump win to the nativist racism of opioid-addled, poor white males. But that would be a mistake, especially given the actual demographics of Trump’s electoral coalition. Trump correctly identified the broad swath of Americans feeling economically left behind and insecure, and his constituents are working class and middle class (and even some upper middle class) more than they are the poor.
Trump's voters have been economically disenfranchised, betrayed by Wall Street and other moneyed interests, and ignored (or worse yet, pandered to) by their government for decades.
Don't get me wrong: The Clintons certainly were responsible for making the bed they were ultimately tossed out of. The petit-scandals and tone-deafness of both Clintons mounted to the point of making it difficult to chalk up their problems to a "vast right-wing conspiracy." With an electorate furious with banking interests, what brand of hubris defends taking piles of money for speeches to Goldman Sachs?
Yes, Americans find it unattractive when their politicians cash in after leaving office, and the Clintons seem like poster children in that department. But they just elected a boorish reality-TV star to the highest office in the land, so the notion that the electorate's sensibilities are all that delicate is a bit far-fetched.
No, the legacy of this election — perhaps, sadly, to become a part of the legacy of President Barack Obama's administration as history is written — is that so many of our families, our homeowners, our middle-aged and aging workers and parents, have been harmed, perhaps irrevocably, by declining real disposable incomes, deteriorating or vanished wealth, no prospects for a reasonably comfortable retirement, and healthcare and education costs that have eroded the little they were able to preserve.
And after eight years of the Obama presidency, despite all the faith they placed in change in 2008 and, somewhat less convincingly in 2012, they wondered:
Why was the administration crowing about job creation when the majority of the jobs created were low wage/low hour full-time positions and gig jobs that were supremely inadequate replacements for the steady, better-paying jobs that preceded them?
Why did the administration do so little to relieve homeowners who lost so much during the crisis and then pat themselves on the back for the cheap-debt-fueled growth in home prices that was concentrated on the coasts and did little for the balance sheets of households in places like Michigan and Wisconsin, Iowa, and Ohio?
And why, in God's name, was that administration touting the benefits of global trade agreements that were negotiated in secret and so patently devoid of benefits to US workers, while these same voters observed that everything they were buying at the store was putting people to work in China, Vietnam, Korea, and Mexico?
Finally — notwithstanding the insanity of the Republican obstruction of a truly responsible national healthcare program for all (which is supported by 58% of the electorate) — instead of the thoroughbred health-insurance policy campaigned for by President Obama, the nation got a two-humped camel, in the form of the Affordable Care Act, that is now limping at best. The chief benefit of ACA, insuring the poor and the young, were not felt by Trump's electorate; all they see are rising insurance premiums (for employer-provided as well as Obamacare-provided healthcare insurance).
US President Barack Obama greeting doctors from across the US in 2009 after making remarks on the need for health-insurance reform.Jim Young/Reuters
Imagine what it must feel like to be told that Obamacare is a "signature accomplishment" of the past eight years if you are not a member of the political or intellectual elites and don't know or don't care about how difficult the ACA was to achieve politically.
Being told what "can't be done" is cold gruel in comparison to being told America can be made great and "I, alone, can fix it."
But the deepest cut for many who ultimately voted for Trump, and I believe the proximate reason for his ultimate success, was the Clinton/Obama effort to squelch the campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders. While the recent WikiLeaks disclosures were somewhat damaging to Clinton, they only confirmed what most people generally felt or, like me, knew. I, however, voted for Clinton — others went a different way or didn't vote.
It was clear over the summer that Sanders would have been a much more formidable candidate than Clinton against Trump. And I have no doubt that he would have won the election this past Tuesday.
Because this election was not about experience in the echo chamber that is Washington, it was not about being grateful for having been rescued from crisis; it was not about the glass ceiling or competence.
This election was about being heard. And just as Sanders heard the anguish of the many, so too (to the anguish, now, of many) did Trump.
Read the original article on Westwood Capital. Copyright 2016.
*******
Hillary Clinton Blames F.B.I. Director for Election Loss
By Amy Chozick
Nov. 12, 2016

Hillary Clinton on Saturday cast blame for her surprise election loss on the announcement by the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, days before the election that he had revived the inquiry into her use of a private email server.
In her most extensive remarks since she conceded the race to Donald J. Trump early Wednesday, Mrs. Clinton told donors on a 30-minute conference call that Mr. Comey’s decision to send a letter to Congress about the inquiry 11 days before Election Day had thrust the controversy back into the news and had prevented her from ending the campaign with an optimistic closing argument.
“There are lots of reasons why an election like this is not successful,” Mrs. Clinton said, according to a donor who relayed the remarks. But, she added, “our analysis is that Comey’s letter raising doubts that were groundless, baseless, proven to be, stopped our momentum.”
Mrs. Clinton said a second letter from Mr. Comey, clearing her once again, which came two days before Election Day, had been even more damaging. In that letter, Mr. Comey said an examination of a new trove of emails, which had been found on the computer of Anthony D. Weiner, the estranged husband of one of her top aides, had not caused him to change his earlier conclusion that Mrs. Clinton should face no charges over her handling of classified information.
Adviser, Ties China and North Korea to Jihadists
Her campaign said the seemingly positive outcome had only hurt it with voters who did not trust Mrs. Clinton and were receptive to Mr. Trump’s claims of a “rigged system.” In particular, white suburban women who had been on the fence were reminded of the email imbroglio and broke decidedly in Mr. Trump’s favor, aides said.
After leading in polls in many battleground states, Mrs. Clinton told the donors on Saturday, “we dropped, and we had to keep really pushing to regain our advantage, which going into last weekend we had.”
“We were once again up in all but two of the battleground states, and we were up considerably in some that we ended up losing,” Mrs. Clinton said. “And we were feeling like we had to put it back together.”
Presidential candidates have a long history of blaming forces outside their control for their losses. In 2004, John Kerry linked his defeat to a videotape of Osama bin Laden that appeared days before the election, stoking fears about terrorism. In 2012, Mitt Romney told donors he had lost because President Obama had vowed to bestow “gifts” on Democratic special interests groups, namely African-Americans, Hispanics and young people.
Mrs. Clinton’s contention appears to be more rooted in reality — and hard data. An internal campaign memo with polling data said that “there is no question that a week from Election Day, Secretary Clinton was poised for a historic win,” but that, in the end, “late-breaking developments in the race proved one hurdle too many for us to overcome.”
Mrs. Clinton lost narrowly in several battleground states, and by the time all ballots are counted, she appears poised to win the popular vote by more than two million votes.
Still, Mrs. Clinton’s instinct to shun any personal responsibility angered some Democrats. Several donors on the call, while deeply bitter about Mr. Comey’s actions, said they believed that Mrs. Clinton and her campaign had suffered avoidable missteps that handed the election to an unacceptable opponent. They pointed to the campaign’s lack of a compelling message for white working-class voters and to decisions years ago by Mrs. Clinton to use a private email address at the State Department and to accept millions of dollars for speeches to Wall Street.
“There is a special place in hell for Clinton staff, allegedly including Cheryl Mills, that okayed the email server setup,” Jim Manley, a Democratic strategist and former senior aide to Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, wrote on Sidewire, a social media site, referring to a longtime aide and lawyer to Mrs. Clinton.

DOCUMENT
Clinton Staff Memo Cites ‘One Hurdle Too Many’
Hillary Clinton's campaign staff distributed an internal memo on Thursday detailing why it thought the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, had played a role in Mrs. Clinton's loss.


OPEN DOCUMENT
Mrs. Clinton’s campaign was so confident in her victory that her aides popped open Champagne on the campaign plane early Tuesday. But that conviction, aides would later learn, was based largely on erroneous data showing that young, black and Latino voters and suburban women who had been turned off by Mr. Trump’s comments but viewed Mrs. Clinton unfavorably would turn out for her in higher numbers than they ultimately did.
Exit polls conducted by Edison Research found that among people who said they had decided in the final week before Election Day, 47 percent voted for Mr. Trump and 42 percent for Mrs. Clinton.
As early as Wednesday morning, aides began to explain to Democrats shaken by the loss that the campaign’s sophisticated data modeling had not taken into account the bombshell F.B.I. announcement.
Mr. Comey’s letters to Congress went against the F.B.I.’s longstanding tradition of avoiding decisions that could affect elections, but he told aides that he felt he had no choice because he had already weighed in on the case so publicly. In July, he had taken the unusual step of publicly announcing that the F.B.I. would not charge Mrs. Clinton.
At the time, she believed she had finally put the issue to rest. And after the final debate on Oct. 19 in Las Vegas, she emerged in such a strong position that she began to focus on campaigning for down-ballot Democrats and planned a campaign stop in traditionally Republican Arizona.
“We felt so good about where we were,” Mrs. Clinton told donors. Before Mr. Comey’s first letter to Congress, she added, “we just had a real wind at our back.”
Mr. Trump seized on the letter, telling voters in Nevada the Saturday before Election Day that “the F.B.I. has reopened its criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton,” and that the matter “would grind government to a halt” should Mrs. Clinton win the White House. The F.B.I.’s examination of the new emails did not in fact reopen the investigation
Democratic pollsters attributed Mr. Trump’s laser-thin victories in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin — states that President Obama had won — largely to a drifting of college-educated suburban women to the Republican nominee at the last minute, because of the renewed focus on Mrs. Clinton’s email server.
“We lost with college-educated whites after leading with them all summer,” a Clinton spokesman, Brian Fallon, said on Wednesday. “Five more days of reminders about Comey, and they gravitated back to Trump.”
Before Mrs. Clinton spoke on Saturday, her finance director, Dennis Cheng, thanked the donors on the call, each of whom had raised at least $100,000. The campaign brought in nearly $1 billion to spend heavily on data efforts, to disperse hundreds of staff members to battleground states, and to air television advertisements — only to fall short to Mr. Trump’s upstart operation.
Donors conceded that, ultimately, no amount of money could match Mr. Trump’s crisp pitch, aimed at the economically downtrodden, to “make America great again.”
“You can have the greatest field program, and we did — he had nothing,” said Jay S. Jacobs, a prominent New York Democrat and donor to Mrs. Clinton. “You can have better ads, paid for by greater funds, and we did. Unfortunately, Trump had the winning argument.”
Mrs. Clinton has kept a low profile since her concession speech at a Midtown Manhattan hotel on Wednesday. On Thursday, a young mother with her 13-month-old daughter spotted Mrs. Clinton walking her dogs near her home in Chappaqua, N.Y., posting a photo of the defeated candidate on Facebook that quickly went viral along with the hashtag #ImStillWithHer.
On Friday night, Mrs. Clinton thanked volunteers on a nationwide conference call. “Look, I’m not going to sugarcoat it,” she said, sighing. “These have been very, very tough days.”

A version of this article appears in print on November 13, 2016, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Clinton Blames F.B.I. Director for Her Defeat. 
*******

Sunday, December 04, 2016

Why Have a Recount?

*******

Jill Stein's Bogus Recount Effort Ends in Complete Failure as Green Party Withdraws From Pennsylvania
Published on Dec 4, 2016
*******

WOW! Recount shows Trump wins by even more than the original count!
Published on Dec 3, 2016
Take out the illegal votes and the dead vote Trump even win by more then previously thought.
Judge Jeanine Pirro "There is going to be a combination of people for the different jobs... that's why President- elect, Donald Trump has had one of the biggest, or the biggest, historical, electoral landslides in a long time because he was able to bring all spectrum's of our party together, move them down the center of the interstate and make it happen!"
- Chief of Staff, Reince Priebus
*******

Hillary Clinton joins campaign to recount votes
Published on Nov 27, 2016
*******

RECOUNT BREAKING NEWS: Recount Not Possible In Pennsylvania. Hillary Can't Win with WI and MI
Published on Nov 27, 2016
My name is H. A. Goodman and I’m an author, columnist, and journalist www.hagoodman.com
*******
*******

Yikes! Is THIS How Hillary Plans to Steal the Election?!?
Published on Nov 26, 2016
The criminal mind never sleeps. So we shouldn't expect the Clinton cartel to take this election loss lying down without making a last ditch effort to steal the presidential seat!
*******

Recount 2016 Scam Exposed
Published on Nov 24, 2016
Jill Stein raised over $2.5 million dollars to launch a recount in three states, hoping to steal the election from Donald Trump and hand it to Hillary Clinton. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story. © 2016 by Mark Dice
*******

Jill Stein Bribed By Clinton to Steal the Election
Published on Nov 24, 2016
*******
Just in! Look what happened when Michigan did a recount...
Published on Nov 23, 2016
*******
Could a recount overturn the election result?
Recounting votes is tedious, expensive—and cathartic
The Economist
Dec 3rd 2016 | CHICAGO
MOST voters yearn for closure after an unusually bitter election campaign, but three of the four candidates for the presidency now claim that the election may not have been free and fair. The loudest is Donald Trump. The president-elect frequently alleged that the election process was rigged and voter fraud common in the run-up to the election. On November 27th he tweeted that he had won the popular vote, “if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally.” Jill Stein, the Green Party’s candidate, raised millions of dollars for a recount of votes in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan, where Mr Trump’s margins of victory were thin. And after initial hesitations, Hillary Clinton’s campaign joined the drive for a recount in the three Midwestern states which, together, handed Mr Trump his victory.
Ms Stein denies that she is pushing for a recount to overturn the election result. She says she is spurred by worries about the “hackability” of voting systems in the wake of the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s network, voter-registration databases in Illinois and Arizona and the e-mail account of John Podesta, Mrs Clinton’s campaign manager. Some suspect that Ms Stein is partly driven by the publicity generated by her initiative and the inflow of funds (and donors’ contact details) to finance the recount. The initiative has given her more airtime than ever before and brought in about $7m, more than she received in the whole year for her presidential run.
Recounts are unlikely to overturn the result. The election was decided, in effect, by slightly more than 100,000 people in three Midwestern states. Mr Trump won Wisconsin with a margin of 0.8% (or 22,000 votes), Michigan with a margin of 0.2% (11,000 votes) and Pennsylvania with 71,000 votes, a margin of 1.2%. But these margins are bigger than any overturned before in a recount.
Merle King, of the Centre for Election Systems at Kennesaw State University, argues that the hacking incidents during the campaign do not mean that voting systems can easily be infiltrated. Voting technology differs between states and even county by county, with some counties using paper ballots, others paperless technology, making a large-scale hack very tricky. Around 75% of all votes are cast on paper, which is safer than those cast on electronic voting machines, some of which provide no paper trail as backup and can be hacked, as researchers have shown. Nearly all states use federally certified technologies, such as encrypting results several times before they are transmitted to a central repository.
Philip Stark, a statistician at the University of California, Berkeley argues that elections never work perfectly because of human error. Recounts usually produce a different result. Ballots can be torn when they are put through a scanner and a sensitive scanner can count a mark where a pencil just rested as a vote. The goal, says Mr King, is to get a reasonable approximation of the result.
The recounters are on a tight deadline: the electoral college must do its work by December 13th. However costly and tiresome, argue Mr Stark and Ronald Rivest of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, elections should be audited regularly, not only when margins are slim. If the results are confirmed, they will bolster voters’ belief in the system. If the process goes badly, as was the case with the chaotic recount in Florida after the presidential election in 2000, it will trigger reforms, such as the famous banishment of hanging chads (partly-punched paper cards). Either way, voters will be able to move on.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline Catharsis.
*******
Why the Progressives Want a Recount They Know They Will Lose
If after all the devious machinations Trump still wins this will be used by the Sandernistas and the Clintonites to cry rigged system
By Dr. Robert R. Owens —— Bio and Archives
December 1, 2016
The recount in Wisconsin and the coming ones in Michigan and Pennsylvania will not change the outcomes in any of those states.  Even though the party of Mayor Daley, Boss Tweed, and their big city machines are famous for winning recounts by finding bags of votes in candy store basements no recount has ever changed thousands of votes let alone tens of thousands.  I do not believe changing the outcome is the purpose.  It is instead changing the perception of it.
I predict that they will demand the recounts are done by hand.  This would make them take so long these three pivotal States would not certify their results by the last day possible for directing their Electors how to vote.  If all three states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232.  No one hits 270.  
This is Hillary and the Progressives strategy to place the mantel of corrupt elite insiders on the Republicans
Then, according to the Constitution, the election would go to Congress.  The House votes with one vote per State.  The Republican House would then elect Donald Trump as the 45th president.  The Republican Senate would elect Pence Vice President.
This has happened before.  In 1824, though Andrew Jackson had more popular votes and more electoral votes John Quincy Adams won in the House.  President Adams made a deal with the Speaker of the House Henry Clay who Adams then named as his Secretary of State, which at the time was considered the stepping stone to the presidency.  This was immediately termed the Corrupt Bargain by supporters of Jackson.  The antagonistic presidential race of 1828 began practically before Adams took office.  To the Jacksonians the Adams-Clay alliance symbolized a corrupt system where elite insiders pursued their own interests without heeding the will of the people.
This is Hillary and the Progressives strategy to place the mantel of corrupt elite insiders on the Republicans now that they see the nation is incensed against the circle of Progressive power brokers who led us from the pinnacle of prosperity to the brink of bankruptcy.  This is akin to how the Democrats have successfully placed the mantel of racist on the party of Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation.  What a masterful stroke of political maneuvering that convinced the descendants of slaves that their natural allies are the descendants of Jim Crow.
If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as the result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it?  The answer is to make Trump seem completely illegitimate. They and their obedient shills in the media will tell us every day and at every opportunity that Trump did not win the popular vote saying he lost by over 2.1 million ignoring the fact that millions of illegals voted.  He did not win the Electoral College since in this scenario he would not have attained 270.  They will say just as they did about Bush the Younger that he was not elected he was selected by members of his own party in Congress.
However, there is one wrinkle in this strategy.  If a state never gets to name electors, the number needed to win does not remain the 270 needed if every state names every elector.  In that case it would once again be a majority of those named.  Even with 260-232, Trump would still win.  Then again the thugs on the left are sending death threats to electors already named trying to frighten some of them into becoming faithless electors who do not vote as instructed by their States.  I don’t foresee this happening.  The number of faithless electors in American History doesn’t make a handful.
So if after all these devious machinations Trump still wins without the election being thrown into Congress this would only be used by the Sandernistas and the Clintonites to cry rigged system.  They would keep their bully boys from Black Lives Matter and Move On in the streets for years while they hope and pray that Trump’s policies don’t make America great again which could solidify his hold over the working men and women throughout the nation.
Energize their low information base for a restoration of corporate socialism in four more years
No matter how this evil strategy plays out, whether the election is thrown into Congress or if Trump wins with a majority of a short electoral count, we will have four years of the Democrats calling this another Corrupt Bargain.  They will try to disrupt the inauguration.  They will have protestors outside the White House from day one.  They will have demonstrations everywhere President Trump goes.  They may even try to incite mass marches and violence in the rotted hulks of our once magnificent cities they control like medieval fiefdoms.  Using their big megaphone in the media they will use print, broadcast, movies, and songs to agitate their followers for the 2020 rematch between the Donald and perhaps Senator Elizabeth Warren or whoever they can scrape up to be the new face for their shopworn collectivist movement.
In other words they know the recount won’t change anything but they hope it will be enough to energize their low information base for a restoration of corporate socialism in four more years.
Dr. Owens teaches History, Political Science, and Religion.  He is the Historian of the Future @
drrobertowens.com
© 2016 Robert R. Owens
drrobertowens@hotmail.com 
Follow Dr. Robert Owens on Facebook or Twitter @ Drrobertowens / Edited by Dr. Rosalie Owens
*******

Friday, December 02, 2016

Take Another Look At The Election?

*******
Catherine Austin Fitts-2017 Destruction of the Old & Creation of the New
Published on Nov 26, 2016
Investment advisor Catherine Austin Fitts says, “We are so overdue for a 25% correction. . . . I think 2017 is going to be a composting. In the destruction of the old, let there be the creation of the new. We’re going to be creating the new, and we’re going to be destroying the old. It’s going to be quirky. There are going to be all kinds of black swans that could hit us. So, do I think we are going to have a major correction and lots of digestive problems? Yes, I do. Now, if the new administration gets what it wants by getting tax rates down and bringing capital back into the country, then there is going to be a very exciting future and a very exciting pathway for North America.”
On gold and silver, Fitts contends, “I think we are in a long-term bull market for gold, but I don’t think the consolidation is over. I was hoping the consolidation was over given how it was trading in the first three quarters, but given how it is trading now, it looks like the consolidation may not be over. The reality is gold is a number of things. In Asia, it’s real money. I think as long as Asia is converging with per capita income, gold is going to have a floor under it, and silver too.
Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Catherine Austin Fitts, Publisher of the Solari Report found on Solari.com.
All links can be found on USAWatchdog.com: http://usawatchdog.com/short-term-neg...
http://usawatchdog.com/donations/
*******

DARK JOURNALIST - HACKED ELECTION: THE FIRESIGN EVENT WILDCARD SPECIAL REPORT!   
Published on Nov 5, 2016
Dark Journalist Election 2016 Special Report
In this fascinating deep analysis of trends and wildcardsin the 2016 election, Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt welcomes two powerful voices in Alternative Media, Influential Author and Publisher of the popular website Forbidden Knowledge TV Alexandra Bruce and Health Freedom Innovator Dr. Robin Falkov of Event Horizons Radio. 
Hacked Election
In the first segment Alexandra Bruce breaks down the implications of revealing and damaging leaks that are having a huge impact on the 2016 Presidential Race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Wikileaks, Anonymous, KimDotCom, DC Leaks and other computer hacking groups have brought a tremendous level of transparency to the public in response to a Corporate Media Firewall of disinformation and brainwashing propaganda. The leaks have demonstrated a level of political corruption that has never been seen before!
FIRESIGN Event
Among all of the powerful leaks that have been released a mysterious and controversial document called the Benenson FIRESIGN Salvage Report shows a major Clinton Strategist running through scenarios to save the election for Clinton from the major turnout of Trump Supporters set to dominate this election The options include a staged Mass UFO wave sighting to distract and confuse the public on election day and throw the results into chaos. The advanced Low Frequency Brainwave Entrainment Laser Technology that would be utilized and deployed is Top Secret Hologram technology that has been tested in the theater of Middle East military operations where religious images were projected on the battlefield to cause large scale defections and surrender of enemy soldiers.
Trump Ascendancy
In the second part Dr. Robin Falkov reveals that the Trump presidency may be the last chance for America to wrestle control back from a variety of special interests that have a Transhumanist agenda that includes Common Core, Open Borders, Mandated Vaccines, The TransPacific Partnership, and the Centralization of Power via a powerful Artificial Intelligence Global Control Grid.
Powerful, informative, eye opening and unnerving. Don't miss this fascinating Dark Journalist Special Report on Election 2016.
*******

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS - BLACK BUDGET ELECTION GAMBIT! DARK JOURNALIST   
Published on Oct 30, 2016
*******

Thursday, December 01, 2016

PizzaGate: the Recent Pedophilia Scandal Involves White House

*******

#PizzaGate Breaking News- Armed Suspect Detained, Incident At DC Shop 
Published on Dec 4, 2016
The widening international PizzaGate controversy may have caused somebody to enter a DC area pizza shop with an assault weapon. Details in this breaking news report- more information will be added as it becomes available. Vigilante justice is never the answer. Core questions surrounding PizzaGate and the Podestas remain completely unanswered by authorities, as well as by Podesta himself.
*******

#PizzaGate What We Know So Far
Published on Nov 27, 2016
Source Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4OP-...
Please Subscribe and Support Reality Calls: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9vw...
*******

15 Years Old Girl Survive Pizzagate Satanic Rituals Abuse
Published on Nov 26, 2016
Source Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLgNm...
Her grandmother made her eat form her own newborn baby.
*******

What is PizzaGate ? Opening the Rabbithole
Published on Nov 25, 2016
*******

What is #PizzaGate? Explained in two minutes.
Published on Nov 23, 2016
A brief explanation of the #PizzaGate controversy/conspiracy, without coming down on either side. Unfortunately I can't link to the Instagram album on Imgur/Slimgur, as it could lead to my channel being taken down, but if you ask on the #PizzaGate hashtag, I'm sure people would be willing to link you to it.

*******
What is Pizzagate? The bizarre Hillary Clinton conspiracy theory that led a man to open fire in an Italian restaurant
The man claimed that he was going to 'self-investigate' the reports, police said. But those reports had already been proven to be entirely baseless and conjured up on the internet
Andrew Griffin @_andrew_griffin
05 December 2016
A Washington pizzeria is the home of a child sex abuse ring that includes people including Hillary Clinton and her campaign chief John Podesta, reports claim. Those reports are entirely baseless and there is no actual evidence that the Comet Ping Pong pizza restaurant is anything but a popular pizza place, but that doesn't matter.
At least the fact that it is entirely untrue doesn't matter to the thousands of online conspiracy theorists and trolls who have promoted the false rumour. And nor did it matter to the man who walked into the restaurant late at night reportedly brandishing a firearm, hoping to "self-investigate" the reports.
Edgar Maddison Welch, 28 of Salisbury, North Carolina, walked into the front door of Comet Ping Pong and pointed a firearm in the direction of a restaurant employee, the Washington Post reported.
The employee was able to flee and notify police. Welch then fired the gun into the floor.
Police responded and arrested Welch without incident. They recovered an assault rifle, Brown said. Welch was charged with assault with a dangerous weapon.
He had come to look into the fictitious conspiracy theory, according to a police statement. But he was far from the first person to become activated by the claims that the pizza was harbouring a secret connection to abuse and the highest echelons of power.
Fake news story led man to open fire in Washington pizza parlour
The beginnings of the "pizzagate" conspiracy theory are murky. But they appear to have originated as long ago as October, when various anonymous Twitter accounts began posting false rumours that Anthony Weiner's laptop had been recovered by the FBI, and that on it was proof that he had been involved in child sexual abuse.
That rumour took off quickly online, among supporters of Donald Trump and others who were convinced about a conspiracy or simply wanted to perpetuate the idea that there is one. And as it took off it grew, too – to take in suggestions that people including Hillary Clinton and John Podesta, her campaign manager, were involved.
Discussion soon turned to Mr Podesta's emails, to Ms Clinton and others, which were published by WikiLeaks. Apparently unable to find any direct suggestion that anyone had been involved in child sexual abuse, those involved in promoting pizzagate began to claim that a code was being used – that code included references to junk food, including "pizza", which was supposedly used in place of the word "girl".
That came, apparently, from the fact that there seemed to more references to pizza and pizzerias than people had expected in the emails. Some of those messages have strange syntax, the proponents claim, apparently suggesting that pizza is being used as code for something else.
From there, it appears that the conspiracy became attached to an actual pizzeria. And from there it wasn't long that the supposed real location was found – the one owned by James Alefantis. He had previously been in a relationship with controversial right-wing commentator and recent Hillary Clinton supporter David Brock – and his pizzeria is in a leafy part of Washington – but it isn't really clear why it had the misfortune of being falsely identified as the home of the conspiracy.
The pizzeria itself put out a statement condemning the events after the man came into the restaurant, as well as the weeks of suspicion and abuse that they have encountered. As it has throughout the events of pizzagate, it stressed that the rumours were putting those caught up in them in real danger.
"For now, I will simply say that we should all condemn the efforts of certain people to spread malicious and utterly false accusations about Comet Ping Pong, a venerated DC institution," owner James Alefantis said in a statement. "Let me state unequivocally: these stories are completely and entirely false, and there is no basis in fact to any of them. What happened today demonstrates that promoting false and reckless conspiracy theories comes with consequences."
*******

Satanic PizzaGate Is Going Viral Worldwide (Elites Are Terrified)
Published on Nov 26, 2016
PizzaGate is going viral worldwide. Too late elites, you can't kill us ALL. You can't accuse us ALL of being pedos, when you're the ones with Instagram accounts filled with the worst possible filth, and emails filled with the worst possible sadism. Child rapists and killers get the electric chair. The Washington Post should be disbanded. The New York Times should be driven into bankruptcy. Very bad people.
*******
#PizzaGate the Documentary, Pedophilia involving Podesta Emails, Clinton, Obama, David Brock, DNC 1
Published on Nov 21, 2016
Please watch: "“I’m not a monster” A pedophile on attraction, love and a life of loneliness" 

This is the complete and definitive documentary on the Pizza Gate Pedophilia Scandal involving John & Tony Podesta, Hillary & Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, the DNC, Andrew Kline and Arun Rao of the DOJ, David Brock of Media Matters, and many more. 

Video courtesy of Titus Frost 

For further research all the links have been compiled on my steemit blog: https://steemit.com/pizzagate/@titusf...
*******